R\u012bgas Domes \u0101rk\u0101rtas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas notika 2020. gada 29.august\u0101. V\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu gait\u0101 atkl\u0101j\u0101s, ka trijos iecirk\u0146os aptuveni 600 v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ju aizpild\u012btie bi\u013ceteni ir ievietoti neatbilsto\u0161i apz\u012bmogot\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu aploksn\u0113s. V\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu likums ne\u013cauj \u0161\u0101d\u0101s aploksn\u0113s ievietotus bi\u013cetenus atz\u012bt par der\u012bgiem un pieskait\u012bt v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ju nodotaj\u0101m bals\u012bm. No 14. l\u012bdz 16. septembrim Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa izskat\u012bja \u010detru politisko partiju un to apvien\u012bbu pieteikumus pret Centr\u0101lo v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu komisiju (CVK), kuros tika pieteikti da\u017e\u0101di pras\u012bjumi – l\u016bgts atcelt R\u012bgas domes v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101tus trijos v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os, uzlikt par pien\u0101kumu CVK izsludin\u0101t atk\u0101rtotu balso\u0161anu trijos v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os, p\u0101rskait\u012bt balsis visos R\u012bgas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os, k\u0101 ar\u012b izsludin\u0101t atk\u0101rtotas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas vai atk\u0101rtotu balso\u0161anu vis\u0101 R\u012bgas pils\u0113t\u0101.<\/p>\n
Tiesa apmierin\u0101ja pietiekumus par balsu p\u0101rskait\u012b\u0161anu trijos R\u012bgas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os, kuros tiesa konstat\u0113ja nejau\u0161as cilv\u0113c\u012bgas k\u013c\u016bdas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146a komisijas darb\u0101, neapz\u012bmogojot v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu aploksnes. Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa veica objekt\u012bvu pier\u0101d\u012bjumu p\u0101rbaudi un secin\u0101ja, ka p\u0101rk\u0101pumi nebija radu\u0161ies \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgas r\u012bc\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c. Iev\u0113rojot min\u0113to, tiesa atk\u0101p\u0101s no Republikas pils\u0113tas domes un novada domes v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu likuma pras\u012bbas atz\u012bt par neder\u012bg\u0101m no v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu kastes iz\u0146emt\u0101s neapz\u012bmogot\u0101s aploksnes. Tiesa uzdeva t\u0101s atv\u0113rt un pieskait\u012bt kop\u0113jam nodoto balsu skaitam, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu Satversm\u0113 noteikt\u0101s pilso\u0146u pamatties\u012bbas piedal\u012bties v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s un paust br\u012bvu v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ju gribu. Tiesa noteica, ka neapz\u012bmogot\u0101s aploksnes ir \u0146emamas v\u0113r\u0101, p\u0101rskaitot balsis trijos v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os.<\/p>\n
Tiesa noraid\u012bja p\u0101r\u0113jos pieteikumus. Tiesa secin\u0101ja, ka nav pamata balsu p\u0101rskait\u012b\u0161anai citos v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu iecirk\u0146os, v\u0113l jo vair\u0101k nav pamata izsludin\u0101t atk\u0101rtotas R\u012bgas domes \u0101rk\u0101rtas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas, jo taisn\u012bgu un atbilsto\u0161u noregul\u0113jumu var pan\u0101kt ar pirmo apgabaltiesas spriedumu par balsu p\u0101rskait\u012b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n
Iev\u0113rojot tiesas nor\u0101des, CVK nekav\u0113joties veica balsu p\u0101rskait\u012b\u0161anu. K\u0101 CVK p\u0101rst\u0101vji to nor\u0101d\u012bja paskaidrojumos tiesai, balsu p\u0101rskait\u012b\u0161ana trijos iecirk\u0146os neietekm\u0113ja iev\u0113l\u0113to R\u012bgas domes sast\u0101vu.<\/p>\n
CVK 17. septembra l\u0113mums par v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101tu apstiprin\u0101\u0161anu nav p\u0101rs\u016bdzams, jo tas ir pie\u0146emts, izpildot Administrat\u012bv\u0101s apgabaltiesas spriedumu. R\u012bgas domes \u0101rk\u0101rtas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas ir nosl\u0113gu\u0161\u0101s un jauniev\u0113l\u0113t\u0101 dome var pilnv\u0113rt\u012bgi uzs\u0101kt darbu.<\/p>\n