COBALT veiksm\u012bgi p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113ja klientu administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 ties\u0101 str\u012bd\u0101 ar valsts dro\u0161\u012bbas iest\u0101d\u0113m par pieeju valsts nosl\u0113pumam, pan\u0101kot nelabv\u0113l\u012bga iest\u0101des l\u0113muma atz\u012b\u0161anu par prettiesisku. Tiesas spriedums ir gal\u012bgs un nav p\u0101rs\u016bdzams.<\/p>\n
COBALT klientam tika atteikta pieeja valsts nosl\u0113pumam, jo vi\u0146\u0161 form\u0101li atbilda to personu lokam, kur\u0101m atbilsto\u0161i likuma \u201ePar valsts nosl\u0113pumu\u201d norm\u0101m pieeja valsts nosl\u0113puma objektiem ir liedzama. Klients uzskat\u012bja, ka pieeja valsts nosl\u0113pumam vi\u0146am atteikta nepamatoti, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c v\u0113rs\u0101s ties\u0101.<\/p>\n
Tiesa atzina, ka administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa b\u016bt\u012bba gan iest\u0101d\u0113, gan ties\u0101 ir ne vien form\u0101li piem\u0113rot likuma normas, bet ar\u012b pan\u0101kt taisn\u012bg\u0101ko lietas rezult\u0101tu. Ar\u012b tad, ja iest\u0101dei likum\u0101 noteikts pien\u0101kums izdod oblig\u0101to administrat\u012bvo aktu, katrs gad\u012bjums j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113 individu\u0101li un ties\u012bbu normas j\u0101interpret\u0113 atbilsto\u0161i to m\u0113r\u0137im. Tiesa atzina, ka rezult\u0101ts, k\u0101ds sasniegts attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz klientu, nav sam\u0113r\u012bgs ar vi\u0146a tiesisko intere\u0161u ierobe\u017eojumu, l\u012bdz ar to ar\u012b taisn\u012bgs un lietder\u012bgs m\u0113r\u0137is nav sasniegts.<\/p>\n
\u0160\u012b ir viena no nedaudzaj\u0101m liet\u0101m Latvijas tiesu praks\u0113, kur tiesa v\u0113rt\u0113ja atteikuma pieejai valsts nosl\u0113pumam tiesiskumu un apmierin\u0101ja pieteic\u0113ja pieteikumu.<\/p>\n
Klienta p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbu Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 apgabalties\u0101 nodro\u0161in\u0101ja zv\u0113rin\u0101ta advok\u0101te Inese Gre\u0137e.<\/p>\n
J\u0101nor\u0101da, ka ties\u012bbas person\u0101m p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t atteikumu pieejai valsts nosl\u0113pumam tika atz\u012btas ar 2017. gada 10. febru\u0101ra Satversmes tiesas spriedumu liet\u0101 Nr. 2016-06-01, kur\u0101 Satversmes tiesa secin\u0101ja, ka likumdev\u0113jam ir j\u0101paredz iesp\u0113ja p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t \u0123ener\u0101lprokurora l\u0113mumus neatkar\u012bg\u0101 tiesisk\u0101 instit\u016bcij\u0101. Pamatojoties uz iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to Satversmes tiesas spriedumu likumdev\u0113js 2018. gad\u0101 veica groz\u012bjumus likum\u0101 \u201cPar valsts nosl\u0113pumu\u201d, nosakot, ka \u0123ener\u0101lprokurora l\u0113mumu persona var p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 apgabalties\u0101, kuras spriedums ir gal\u012bgs un nav p\u0101rs\u016bdzams.<\/p>\n
Konstitucion\u0101lo s\u016bdz\u012bbu un klienta p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbu Satversmes ties\u0101 sagatavoja COBALT komanda vado\u0161\u0101 partnera Laura Liepas vad\u012bb\u0101.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
COBALT veiksm\u012bgi p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113ja klientu administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 ties\u0101 str\u012bd\u0101 ar valsts dro\u0161\u012bbas iest\u0101d\u0113m par pieeju valsts nosl\u0113pumam, pan\u0101kot nelabv\u0113l\u012bga iest\u0101des l\u0113muma atz\u012b\u0161anu par prettiesisku. Tiesas spriedums ir gal\u012bgs un nav p\u0101rs\u016bdzams. COBALT klientam tika atteikta pieeja valsts nosl\u0113pumam, jo vi\u0146\u0161 form\u0101li atbilda..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":43033,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"country":[96],"class_list":["post-12001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized-lv","country-latvia-lv"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n