{"id":50983,"date":"2026-01-05T11:13:30","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T09:13:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/?p=50983"},"modified":"2026-01-05T11:15:27","modified_gmt":"2026-01-05T09:15:27","slug":"ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/","title":{"rendered":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments"},"content":{"rendered":"

L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ko konstat\u0113ja Konkurences padome<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

2018.gada 9.mart\u0101 Konkurences padome (KP) pie\u0146\u0113ma l\u0113mumu, konstat\u0113jot Negod\u012bgas mazumtirdzniec\u012bbas prakses aizlieguma likuma (zaud\u0113jis sp\u0113ku) 6.panta 1.da\u013cas 11.punkta p\u0101rk\u0101pumu divu uz\u0146\u0113mumu darb\u012bb\u0101s. P\u0101rk\u0101pums izpaud\u0101s k\u0101 netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161ana p\u0101rtikas pre\u010du pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. Abiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem tika uzlikts naudas sods un pien\u0101kums KP konstat\u0113tos p\u0101rk\u0101pumus nov\u0113rst.<\/p>\n

KP konstat\u0113ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumi piem\u0113roja netaisn\u012bgas un nepamatotas sankcijas, proti, soda naudu par nepiln\u012bgu pre\u010du pieg\u0101di vai pre\u010du nepieg\u0101d\u0101\u0161anu visp\u0101r 10\u2013100% apm\u0113r\u0101 no pamatpar\u0101da summas un soda naudu par cenu neprecizit\u0101t\u0113m pre\u010du pavadz\u012bm\u0113s 10% l\u012bdz vair\u0101k nek\u0101 100% apm\u0113r\u0101 no pamatpar\u0101da summas. Ar\u012b sadarb\u012bbas l\u012bgumos ietvertais nosac\u012bjums, ka l\u012bguma noteikumu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu gad\u012bjum\u0101 pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums samaks\u0101t taisn\u012bgu un pamatotu l\u012bgumsodu, neesot skaidrs un nep\u0101rprotams. Turkl\u0101t izlases veid\u0101 ieg\u016bt\u0101 inform\u0101cija liecina, ka \u0161\u0101du netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu sankciju piem\u0113ro\u0161ana bijusi sistem\u0101tiska.<\/p>\n

KP uzsv\u0113ra, ka mazumtirgot\u0101jiem, kuriem piem\u012bt iepirkuma vara, ir aizliegts noteikt netaisn\u012bgas un nepamatotas sankcijas par l\u012bguma p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem. \u0160\u0101d\u0101m sankcij\u0101m j\u0101b\u016bt sam\u0113r\u012bg\u0101m ar p\u0101rk\u0101pumu un paredzamo kait\u0113jumu, k\u0101 ar\u012b atbilsto\u0161\u0101m god\u012bgai dar\u012bjumu praksei un labas tic\u012bbas principam. T\u0101s nedr\u012bkst k\u013c\u016bt par papildu ien\u0101kumu avotu, izmantojot tirgus varu pret pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem.<\/p>\n

KP ieskat\u0101 pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem piem\u0113rot\u0101s sankcijas par nepiln\u012bgu pre\u010du pas\u016bt\u012bjumu izpildi nevarot tikt uzskat\u012btas par taisn\u012bg\u0101m un pamatot\u0101m. Ar\u012b tad, ja pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js nav veicis pre\u010du pieg\u0101di visp\u0101r, l\u012bgumsodam j\u0101b\u016bt sam\u0113r\u012bgam ar mazumtirgot\u0101jam nodar\u012bto kait\u0113jumu un nepieg\u0101d\u0101to pre\u010du v\u0113rt\u012bbu, turkl\u0101t mazumtirgot\u0101jam j\u0101sp\u0113j pamatot piem\u0113rot\u0101 l\u012bgumsoda apm\u0113ru. Konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mumi to neesot dar\u012bju\u0161i, sankcijas uzskat\u0101mas par nepamatot\u0101m ar\u012b tad, ja t\u0101s anul\u0113tas, veicot vienpus\u0113ju ieskaitu vai vienojoties ar pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju par iepriek\u0161 nepl\u0101not\u0101m pre\u010du akcij\u0101m.<\/p>\n

Ko atzinu\u0161as tiesas<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Nepiekr\u012btot KP secin\u0101tajam, abi uz\u0146\u0113mumi l\u0113mumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja, l\u016bdzot tiesu to atcelt. Viens no centr\u0101lajiem lietas jaut\u0101jumiem saist\u012bts tie\u0161i ar Civillikuma (CL)\u00a01716.panta<\/a>\u00a03.da\u013cas piem\u0113ro\u0161anu. T\u0101 noteic, ka\u00a0l\u012bgumsods par saist\u012bbu nepien\u0101c\u012bgu izpildi vai neizpild\u012b\u0161anu \u012bst\u0101 laik\u0101 (termi\u0146\u0101) var tikt noteikts pieaugo\u0161s, ta\u010du kopum\u0101 ne vair\u0101k par 10% no pamatpar\u0101da vai galven\u0101s saist\u012bbas apm\u0113ra<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Lieta l\u012bdz \u0161im skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes\u00a0\u2013 \u010detras reizes administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 ties\u0101 un tr\u012bs reizes Sen\u0101t\u0101. Lai gan 2024.gada 16.j\u016bnij\u0101 Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa KP l\u0113mumu atzina par tiesisku, Sen\u0101ts v\u0113lreiz ierosin\u0101jis kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu, un process turpin\u0101s.<\/p>\n

Tiesved\u012bbas pirm\u0101 k\u0101rta<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Izskatot lietu pirmo reizi, Administrat\u012bv\u0101 apgabaltiesa secin\u0101ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumiem neap\u0161aub\u0101mi piem\u012bt iepirkuma vara p\u0101r pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. Tiesa piekrita KP, ka starp uz\u0146\u0113mumiem un pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem nepast\u0101v piln\u012bga priv\u0101tautonomija, bet to ierobe\u017eo mazumtirgot\u0101ja poz\u012bcija, pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jus padarot zin\u0101m\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101 atkar\u012bgus. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di \u0161\u0101d\u0101m dar\u012bjumu attiec\u012bb\u0101m piln\u012bb\u0101 nepiem\u012btot civilties\u012bb\u0101m visp\u0101r\u012bgi rakstur\u012bg\u0101 l\u012bgumu sl\u0113g\u0161anas br\u012bv\u012bba, un civilties\u012bbu instrumenti ir piem\u0113rojami tikt\u0101l, cikt\u0101l tas atbilst god\u012bgai dar\u012bjumu praksei.<\/p>\n

Tiesa secin\u0101ja, ka l\u012bgumos noteikt\u0101s sankcijas, neparedzot konkr\u0113tu piem\u0113rojam\u0101 l\u012bgumsoda apm\u0113ru vai nosakot to pieaugo\u0161u, kas p\u0101rsniedz 10%, ir nesam\u0113r\u012bgas un neatbilst Negod\u012bgas mazumtirdzniec\u012bbas prakses aizlieguma likum\u0101 noteiktajam aizliegumam. Tas vien, ka pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js l\u012bgumsodu samaks\u0101, neliecina par to, ka pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js tam ir piekritis. Un l\u012bguma noteikums, kas nav iepriek\u0161 skaidri defin\u0113ts, bet var tikt vienpus\u0113ji interpret\u0113ts un piem\u0113rots atkar\u012bb\u0101 no konkr\u0113tajiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem, nevar tikt atz\u012bts par sam\u0113r\u012bgu un atbilsto\u0161u god\u012bgai dar\u012bjumu praksei. Ar\u012b apst\u0101klis, ka pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js, parakstot l\u012bgumu, piekr\u012bt sev neizdev\u012bgiem l\u012bguma noteikumiem, \u0161os noteikumus nepadara par taisn\u012bgiem un pamatotiem.<\/p>\n

Abi uz\u0146\u0113mumi spriedumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja Sen\u0101t\u0101. Sen\u0101ts atzina, ka apgabaltiesa l\u012bgumsodu regul\u0113jo\u0161\u0101s normas piem\u0113rojusi nepareizi un nav analiz\u0113jusi korekti. Tiesa skaidroja l\u012bgumsoda ierobe\u017eo\u0161anas noteik\u0161anas m\u0113r\u0137i un iemeslus, nor\u0101dot, ka CL\u00a01716.panta\u00a0<\/a>3.da\u013c\u0101 noteiktais 10% ierobe\u017eojums attiecas tikai uz pieaugo\u0161u l\u012bgumsodu. Proti, ja l\u012bgum\u0101 nav noteikts pieaugo\u0161s l\u012bgumsods, tad neatkar\u012bgi no t\u0101, k\u0101da veida p\u0101rk\u0101pums past\u0101v\u00a0\u2013 saist\u012bbas neizpilde visp\u0101r, nepien\u0101c\u012bga vai kav\u0113ta izpilde\u00a0\u2013, CL\u00a01716.panta<\/a>\u00a03.da\u013ca nav piem\u0113rojama.<\/p>\n

Papildus uzsv\u0113rts, ka l\u012bgumsoda sam\u0113r\u012bgums j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113 kompleksi\u00a0\u2013 j\u0101apskata gan saikne un sam\u0113rs ar rad\u012btajiem zaud\u0113jumiem, gan dar\u012bjumu dal\u012bbnieku attiec\u012bbas kopum\u0101 no juridisk\u0101 un ekonomisk\u0101 viedok\u013ca. J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101 apst\u0101k\u013ci, k\u0101dos pusei j\u0101pilda saist\u012bbas, par kuru p\u0101rk\u0101pumu l\u012bgumsods piem\u0113rots. Attiec\u012bgi, ja vienai pusei ir man\u0101mi gr\u016bt\u0101k pild\u012bt savas saist\u012bbas, ja tai ir j\u0101panes netaisn\u012bgs risku sadal\u012bjums, ja faktisk\u0101 izpilde parasti ir \u0113rta tikai vienai pusei, ja l\u012bgumsodu sist\u0113ma, iev\u0113rojot attiec\u012bg\u0101s nozares specifiku u.tml., ir past\u0101v\u012bgs papildu pe\u013c\u0146as avots vienai l\u012bguma pusei,\u00a0\u2013 tas viss var ietekm\u0113t v\u0113rt\u0113jumu par to, vai l\u012bgumsods attiec\u012bgaj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 ir sam\u0113r\u012bgs ar p\u0101rk\u0101pumu. Turkl\u0101t l\u012bgumsods var izr\u0101d\u012bties netaisn\u012bgs pat tad, ja tas form\u0101li atbilst CL\u00a01716.pantam<\/a>. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di Sen\u0101ts atzina, ka apgabaltiesas secin\u0101jumi par l\u012bgumsodu ir izdar\u012bti, pamatojoties uz nepareiz\u0101m ties\u012bbu norm\u0101m. Apgabaltiesas spriedums tika atcelts un nos\u016bt\u012bts jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai apgabalties\u0101.<\/p>\n

Tiesved\u012bbas otr\u0101 k\u0101rta<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Skatot lietu atk\u0101rtoti, apgabaltiesa uz\u0146\u0113mumu l\u016bgumu noraid\u012bja. Tiesa argument\u0113ja, ka nevar piekrist uz\u0146\u0113mumu viedoklim, ka gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja no veikt\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bjuma nav pieg\u0101d\u0101tas atsevi\u0161\u0137as preces, b\u016btu j\u0101piem\u0113ro l\u012bgumsods par pre\u010du nepieg\u0101di 100% apm\u0113r\u0101, k\u0101 tas dar\u012bts \u0161aj\u0101 liet\u0101. Uz\u0146\u0113mumi t\u0101pat neesot pamatoju\u0161i un pier\u0101d\u012bju\u0161i, ka tiem radu\u0161ies t\u0101di zaud\u0113jumi, lai l\u012bgumsods 100% apm\u0113r\u0101 no pamatpar\u0101da attaisnotu t\u0101 piem\u0113ro\u0161anu. Turkl\u0101t nav taisn\u012bgs, sam\u0113r\u012bgs un god\u012bgai dar\u012bjumu praksei atbilsto\u0161s t\u0101ds l\u012bguma nosac\u012bjums, kas ne\u013cauj konkretiz\u0113t l\u012bgumsoda apm\u0113ru par iesp\u0113jamiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem. Tiesa atzina, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumi nav piem\u0113roju\u0161i pieaugo\u0161u l\u012bgumsodu, ta\u010du l\u012bgumsodam t\u0101pat j\u0101b\u016bt sam\u0113r\u012bgam.<\/p>\n

Uz\u0146\u0113mumi ar\u012b \u0161o spriedumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja Sen\u0101t\u0101, argument\u0113jot, ka tiesa nav iev\u0113rojusi Sen\u0101ta iepriek\u0161 sniegto ties\u012bbu normu interpret\u0101ciju.<\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ts nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka apgabaltiesa nav pareizi izpratusi l\u012bgumsoda piem\u0113ro\u0161anas at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bbas piln\u012bgas un da\u013c\u0113jas nepieg\u0101des gad\u012bjumos, t\u0101p\u0113c t\u0101s v\u0113rt\u0113jums ir pretrun\u012bgs. Tiesa k\u013c\u016bdaini secin\u0101ja, ka 100% l\u012bgumsods ir nepamatots, jo pas\u016bt\u012bjums bijis da\u013c\u0113ji izpild\u012bts, ignor\u0113jot, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumi sodu piem\u0113roja tikai par nepieg\u0101d\u0101taj\u0101m prec\u0113m. Tiesa t\u0101 ar\u012b nenoskaidroja, vai 100% sods attiecas uz visu pas\u016bt\u012bjumu vai tikai uz iztr\u016bksto\u0161o da\u013cu. Ja sods noteikts tikai par nepieg\u0101d\u0101to apjomu, sam\u0113r\u012bguma v\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101 nav noz\u012bmes tam, ka p\u0101r\u0113jais pas\u016bt\u012bjums izpild\u012bts.<\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ts piekrita uz\u0146\u0113mumu iebildumam, ka apgabaltiesa nepamatoti pras\u012bjusi katr\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 individu\u0101li pamatot l\u012bgumsoda apm\u0113ru un atbilst\u012bbu zaud\u0113jumiem. \u0160\u0101da pieeja atbilst krimin\u0101lties\u012bb\u0101m, nevis civilties\u012bb\u0101m, kur l\u012bgumsoda apm\u0113rs tiek noteikts jau l\u012bguma sl\u0113g\u0161anas br\u012bd\u012b k\u0101 visp\u0101r\u0113js meh\u0101nisms p\u0101rk\u0101pumu gad\u012bjumiem. Apgabaltiesa t\u0101pat p\u0101rlieku stingri v\u0113rt\u0113jusi sam\u0113r\u012bgumu un nepamatoti noraid\u012bjusi uz\u0146\u0113mumu ekonomiskos argumentus, kas izriet no CL\u00a01716.panta<\/a>,\u00a0\u2013 l\u012bgumsods kalpo zaud\u0113jumu kompens\u0113\u0161anai un prevent\u012bvai iedarb\u012bbai. T\u0101p\u0113c apgabaltiesa lietu v\u0113rt\u0113jusi nepiln\u012bgi un vienpus\u0113ji, ar pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas pien\u0101kumu p\u0101rm\u0113r\u012bgi noslogojot vienu dar\u012bjuma pusi. Sen\u0101ts ar\u012b da\u013c\u0113ji piekrita, ka apgabaltiesa main\u012bjusi KP argument\u0101ciju, aizst\u0101jot 10% m\u0113rauklu ar citiem krit\u0113rijiem, un uz\u0146\u0113mumiem bija j\u0101nodro\u0161ina iesp\u0113ja par to izteikties, ta\u010du tas nav b\u016btiski main\u012bjis iest\u0101des pamatojumu. Apgabaltiesas spriedums ar\u012b \u0161oreiz tika atcelts, un lieta nos\u016bt\u012bta jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai apgabalties\u0101.<\/p>\n

Tiesved\u012bbas tre\u0161\u0101 k\u0101rta<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Izskatot lietu tre\u0161o reizi, administrat\u012bv\u0101 tiesa uz\u0146\u0113mumu pieteikumu atcelt KP l\u0113mumu atk\u0101rtoti noraid\u012bja. Tiesa secin\u0101ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumu sistem\u0101tiski \u012bstenot\u0101 l\u012bgumsodu noteik\u0161anas metodika un neskaidrie l\u012bguma noteikumi ir \u013c\u0101vu\u0161i tiem patva\u013c\u012bgi interpret\u0113t sankciju apm\u0113ru gad\u012bjumos, kad konstat\u0113ta nepiln\u012bga pre\u010du pieg\u0101de vai pre\u010du pieg\u0101de ar neprec\u012bzu cenu. L\u012bgumsodu apm\u0113rs ir bijis b\u016btisks, un l\u012bgumiskaj\u0101s attiec\u012bb\u0101s saskat\u0101ms nel\u012bdzsvarots risku sadal\u012bjums. T\u0101pat l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anas prakse nav bijusi balst\u012bta uz pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju pie\u013cauto p\u0101rk\u0101pumu objekt\u012bvu nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu un attiec\u012bgi l\u012bgumsodi nav biju\u0161i sam\u0113r\u012bgi.<\/p>\n

Tiesa papildus nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka KP l\u0113muma pamatojum\u0101 ir konstat\u0113jami tr\u016bkumi, tom\u0113r KP veiktais l\u012bgumsodu sam\u0113r\u012bguma v\u0113rt\u0113jums kopum\u0101 bijis pareizs. T\u0101 k\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mumiem atbild\u012bba noteikta nevis par CL normu, bet gan par Negod\u012bgas mazumtirdzniec\u012bbas prakses aizlieguma likuma normas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, KP k\u013c\u016bda nevar b\u016bt pamats atzinumam, ka KP l\u0113mums kopum\u0101 nav pamatots un t\u0101d\u0113\u013c ir prettiesisks.<\/p>\n

Uz\u0146\u0113mumi atk\u0101rtoti v\u0113rs\u0101s Sen\u0101t\u0101 un spriedumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja. Sen\u0101ts, atsakot ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu da\u013c\u0101 par l\u012bgumsodu sam\u0113r\u012bgumu, atzina, ka KP l\u012bgumsodu sam\u0113r\u012bgumu nepamatoti v\u0113rt\u0113ja kontekst\u0101 ar CL\u00a01716.panta<\/a>\u00a03.da\u013cu, jo \u0161\u012b norma nav piem\u0113rojama. Ta\u010du piem\u0113rotie l\u012bgumsodi t\u0101pat biju\u0161i nesam\u0113r\u012bgi augsti. Savuk\u0101rt uz\u0146\u0113mumu arguments par to, ka apgabaltiesa nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, vai k\u013c\u016bdas KP l\u0113muma pamatojum\u0101 nav ietekm\u0113ju\u0161as piem\u0113roto naudas sodu, bija pamatots, un \u0161aj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bba tika ierosin\u0101ta.<\/p>\n

Attiec\u012bgi Sen\u0101ts nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka secin\u0101jumu par p\u0101rk\u0101puma smagumu, it \u012bpa\u0161i par t\u0101 rad\u012btaj\u0101m sek\u0101m, var ietekm\u0113t tas, k\u0101 tiek nov\u0113rt\u0113ts, vai p\u0101rk\u0101pums ir pie\u013cauts. Secin\u0101jums par p\u0101rk\u0101puma smagumu var at\u0161\u0137irties situ\u0101cij\u0101, kad l\u012bgumsoda sam\u0113r\u012bgums tiek v\u0113rt\u0113ts, pie\u0146emot, ka tas nedr\u012bkst p\u0101rsniegt 10%, un situ\u0101cij\u0101, kad tiek atz\u012bts, ka l\u012bgumsods var b\u016bt sam\u0113r\u012bgs ar\u012b tad, ja tas p\u0101rsniedz 10%. Ja tiek pie\u013cauts, ka sam\u0113r\u012bgs l\u012bgumsods var ar\u012b p\u0101rsniegt 10%, tad p\u0101rk\u0101pums var izr\u0101d\u012bties maz\u0101k kait\u012bgs, jo l\u012bgumsods tik iev\u0113rojami nep\u0101rsniedz sam\u0113r\u012bguma robe\u017eu, k\u0101 tad, ja tiek atz\u012bts, ka jebkur\u0161 l\u012bgumsods, kas p\u0101rsniedz 10%, ir nesam\u0113r\u012bgs. Savuk\u0101rt izv\u0113rt\u0113jums par to, cik smags ir p\u0101rk\u0101pums, var ietekm\u0113t naudas soda apm\u0113ru. L\u012bdz ar to nevar izsl\u0113gt, ka nepareiza CL\u00a01716.panta<\/a>\u00a03.da\u013cas piem\u0113ro\u0161ana var ietekm\u0113t p\u0101rk\u0101puma smaguma nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu un l\u012bdz ar to ar\u012b piem\u0113roto naudas sodu.<\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ts t\u0101pat papildus nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 Konkurences likums nepie\u0161\u0137ir tiesai ties\u012bbas groz\u012bt administrat\u012bvo aktu un noteikt t\u0101 saturu. L\u012bdz ar to tiesai nav ties\u012bbu noteikt naudas soda apm\u0113ru. Attiec\u012bgi, ja, skatot lietu atk\u0101rtoti, tiesa atz\u012btu, ka k\u013c\u016bda KP l\u0113mum\u0101 ietekm\u0113ja piem\u0113rot\u0101 soda apm\u0113ru, tiesai KP l\u0113mums b\u016btu j\u0101atce\u013c. L\u012bdz ar to Sen\u0101ts apgabaltiesas spriedumu atc\u0113la da\u013c\u0101 par naudassodu un nos\u016bt\u012bja jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai apgabaltiesai.<\/p>\n

Tiesved\u012bbas ceturt\u0101 k\u0101rta<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Administrat\u012bvajai apgabaltiesai, izskatot lietu ceturto reizi, bija j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113, cikt\u0101l nepareiz\u0101 CL normas piem\u0113ro\u0161ana var\u0113ja ietekm\u0113t naudas soda lieluma noteik\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Tiesa atzina, ka naudas soda apm\u0113ru konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 nevar\u0113ja ietekm\u0113t tiesved\u012bbas laik\u0101 konstat\u0113t\u0101s k\u013c\u016bdas p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 l\u0113muma pamatojum\u0101. Tas vien, ka naudas soda apm\u0113rs noteikts pirms k\u013c\u016bdu konstat\u0113\u0161anas un ka t\u0101p\u0113c p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113tais l\u0113mums joproj\u0101m form\u0101li satur atsevi\u0161\u0137as k\u013c\u016bdas pamatojum\u0101, nevar b\u016bt pamats t\u0101 atcel\u0161anai da\u013c\u0101 par noteikto naudas sodu, ja secin\u0101ms, ka konkr\u0113t\u0101s k\u013c\u016bdas nav ietekm\u0113ju\u0161as t\u0101 rezult\u0101tu. L\u012bdz ar to uz\u0146\u0113mumu pieteikums par KP l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu da\u013c\u0101 par naudas sodu noraid\u012bts.<\/p>\n

Neskatoties uz to, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumu darb\u012bb\u0101s tom\u0113r konstat\u0113ts p\u0101rk\u0101pums, lieta v\u0113l joproj\u0101m nav nosl\u0113gusies, jo Sen\u0101ts atk\u0101rtoti\u00a0\u2013 jau ceturto reizi\u00a0\u2013 ierosin\u0101jis kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu. Sen\u0101tam b\u016bs j\u0101lemj, vai apgabaltiesa pamatoti uz\u0146\u0113mumiem piem\u0113roto soda naudu atzinusi par pareizu.<\/p>\n

Kam\u0113r lietas izn\u0101kums v\u0113l gaid\u0101ms, ir redzams, ka l\u012bgumbr\u012bv\u012bba nav absol\u016bta\u00a0\u2013 to ierobe\u017eo god\u012bgas dar\u012bjumu prakses un sam\u0113r\u012bguma principi. Kad l\u012bgumsods tiek piem\u0113rots sistem\u0101tiski un bez ekonomiska pamatojuma, tas var neatspogu\u013cot riska sadal\u012bjumu. L\u012bdz ar to l\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments \u0161aj\u0101 liet\u0101 ieg\u016bst re\u0101lu saturu\u00a0\u2013 tas k\u013c\u016bst par robe\u017ez\u012bmi starp priv\u0101tties\u012bbu pa\u0161regul\u0101ciju un publisk\u0101s varas iejauk\u0161anos gad\u012bjumos, kad l\u012bgumbr\u012bv\u012bba vairs nenodro\u0161ina god\u012bgu konkurenci.<\/p>\n

Publik\u0101cija: itiesibas.lv<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":50985,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"country":[96],"class_list":["post-50983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized-lv","country-latvia-lv"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nL\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"lv_LV\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"COBALT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"L\u012bva Dumpe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"L\u012bva Dumpe\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"L\u012bva Dumpe\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3\"},\"headline\":\"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2625,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Uncategorized @lv\"],\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/\",\"name\":\"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1440},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\",\"name\":\"COBALT\",\"description\":\"Top-tier law services in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"COBALT\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cobalt-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cobalt-logo.png\",\"width\":400,\"height\":116,\"caption\":\"COBALT\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CobaltLegal\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3\",\"name\":\"L\u012bva Dumpe\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/author\\\/liva\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT","description":"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/","og_locale":"lv_LV","og_type":"article","og_title":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT","og_description":"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/","og_site_name":"COBALT","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1440,"url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"L\u012bva Dumpe","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"L\u012bva Dumpe","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/"},"author":{"name":"L\u012bva Dumpe","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/person\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3"},"headline":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments","datePublished":"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/"},"wordCount":2625,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg","articleSection":["Uncategorized @lv"],"inLanguage":"lv-LV"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/","name":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments | COBALT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg","datePublished":"2026-01-05T09:13:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-05T09:15:27+00:00","description":"L\u012bgumsods tradicion\u0101li tiek uzl\u016bkots k\u0101 civilties\u012bbu instruments, kas nodro\u0161ina saist\u012bbu izpildi un kompens\u0113 gr\u016bti pier\u0101d\u0101mus zaud\u0113jumus. Tom\u0113r noteiktos tirgus apst\u0101k\u013cos \u0161is civiltiesiskais meh\u0101nisms var k\u013c\u016bt ar\u012b par konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instrumentu. To spilgti ilustr\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 lieta par Konkurences padomes l\u0113mumu, ar kuru diviem mazumtirgot\u0101jiem uzlikts sods par netaisn\u012bgu un nepamatotu l\u012bgumsodu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. \u0160\u012b lieta, kas da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s tiesu instanc\u0113s skat\u012bta jau septi\u0146as reizes, k\u013cuvusi par robe\u017e\u0161\u0137irtni starp l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju br\u012bv\u012bbu un tirgus varas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgu izmanto\u0161anu.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"lv-LV","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"lv-LV","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/steve-johnson-d7auhplxlpa-unsplash.jpg","width":2560,"height":1440},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/ligumsods-ka-konkurences-ierobezojuma-instruments\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"L\u012bgumsods k\u0101 konkurences ierobe\u017eojuma instruments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/","name":"COBALT","description":"Top-tier law services in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"lv-LV"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization","name":"COBALT","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"lv-LV","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cobalt-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cobalt-logo.png","width":400,"height":116,"caption":"COBALT"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/person\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3","name":"L\u012bva Dumpe","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/author\/liva\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50983"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50991,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50983\/revisions\/50991"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50985"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50983"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=50983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}