{"id":54840,"date":"2026-04-24T09:34:19","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/?p=54840"},"modified":"2026-04-24T09:35:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:35:03","slug":"vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/","title":{"rendered":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedums<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

K\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?<\/p>\n

Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.<\/p>\n

Uzaicin\u0101juma sludin\u0101jums ofici\u0101laj\u0101 izdevum\u0101 ir dom\u0101ts nezin\u0101miem mantiniekiem, savuk\u0101rt, zin\u0101miem mantiniekiem par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos ir j\u0101pazi\u0146o rakstveid\u0101 un individu\u0101li<\/p>\n

Izskatot \u0161o k\u0101zusu, Sen\u0101ts 2026.gada 29.janv\u0101ra spriedum\u0101 liet\u0101\u00a0SKC-101\/2026<\/a>\u00a0atg\u0101dina jau iepriek\u0161 judikat\u016br\u0101 nostiprin\u0101to atzi\u0146u, ka uzaicin\u0101juma sludin\u0101jums ofici\u0101laj\u0101 izdevum\u0101 ir dom\u0101ts nezin\u0101miem mantiniekiem, savuk\u0101rt, zin\u0101miem mantiniekiem par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos ir j\u0101pazi\u0146o rakstveid\u0101 un individu\u0101li, neatkar\u012bgi no sludin\u0101juma public\u0113\u0161anas. Zin\u0101mos mantiniekus sav\u0101 manto\u0161anas iesniegum\u0101 uzr\u0101da persona, kura ierosina pie not\u0101ra mantojuma lietu, un neatkar\u012bgi no sludin\u0101juma public\u0113\u0161anas \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d not\u0101rs pazi\u0146o par mantojuma izsludin\u0101\u0161anu un sludin\u0101juma saturu \u0161iem zin\u0101majiem mantiniekiem.<\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ts akcent\u0113ja, ka Ministru kabineta noteikumu Nr.618 \u201cNoteikumi par mantojuma re\u0123istra un mantojuma lietu ve\u0161anu\u201d\u00a077.punkts<\/a>\u00a0(redakcij\u0101, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 mantojuma lietas ve\u0161anas laik\u0101) formul\u0113ts k\u0101 imperat\u012bva ties\u012bbu norma, kas not\u0101ram uzliek pien\u0101kumu par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101s sludin\u0101juma saturu rakstveid\u0101 pazi\u0146ot zin\u0101maj\u0101m mantojuma liet\u0101 ieinteres\u0113taj\u0101m person\u0101m. R\u012bc\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bba \u0161aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 amatpersonai nav paredz\u0113ta.<\/p>\n

No t\u0101 izriet b\u016btisks secin\u0101jums: ja not\u0101ra r\u012bc\u012bba neatbilst normat\u012bv\u0101 akta priek\u0161rakstiem, t\u0101 nevar rad\u012bt negat\u012bvas tiesisk\u0101s sekas zin\u0101majam mantiniekam, aizskarot vi\u0146a ties\u012bbas uz mantojumu. Proti, liet\u0101 tika nodibin\u0101ts, ka p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 bija inform\u0113jusi not\u0101ru, ka mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113jam ir d\u0113ls (nor\u0101dot, ka kontaktinform\u0101cija nav zin\u0101ma) un ar\u012b apmaks\u0101ja izdevumus par ieskat\u012b\u0161anos iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju re\u0123istr\u0101, lai ieg\u016btu datus par \u0161o personu, tostarp vi\u0146a dz\u012bvesvietu, ta\u010du pret\u0113ji normat\u012bvo aktu pras\u012bb\u0101m not\u0101rs neizpild\u012bja pien\u0101kumu rakstveid\u0101 inform\u0113t min\u0113to personu par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos un sludin\u0101juma saturu.<\/p>\n

Ja not\u0101ra r\u012bc\u012bba neatbilst normat\u012bv\u0101 akta priek\u0161rakstiem, t\u0101 nevar rad\u012bt negat\u012bvas tiesisk\u0101s sekas zin\u0101majam mantiniekam, aizskarot vi\u0146a ties\u012bbas uz mantojumu<\/p>\n

Iev\u0113rojot min\u0113to, Sen\u0101ts spriedum\u0101 uzsv\u0113ra, ka pazi\u0146o\u0161anas faktam par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos un sludin\u0101juma saturu ir b\u016btiska noz\u012bme, lai sludin\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bto termi\u0146u atz\u012btu par prekluz\u012bvu zin\u0101majam mantiniekam. Ja \u0161\u0101da pazi\u0146ojuma nav, sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteiktais termi\u0146\u0161 zin\u0101majam mantiniekam, kur\u0161 nezina par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos, nav prekluz\u012bvs. \u0160\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 (neesot uzaicin\u0101jumam) ir piem\u0113rojams Civillikuma (CL)\u00a0693.panta<\/a>\u00a03.da\u013c\u0101 (redakcij\u0101, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2025.gada 1.janv\u0101rim) noteiktais termi\u0146\u0161, kas paredz, ka griba pie\u0146emt mantojumu j\u0101izsaka gada laik\u0101 no zi\u0146u par to, ka mantojums atkl\u0101jies, sa\u0146em\u0161anas br\u012b\u017ea.<\/p>\n

K\u0101 pie\u0146emt mantojumu saska\u0146\u0101 ar jauno regul\u0113jumu<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

B\u016btiski, ka Sen\u0101ta spriedums liet\u0101 SKC-101\/2026 attiecas uz mantojuma ties\u012bbu regul\u0113jumu, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2024.gada 31.decembrim, t.i., pirms t\u0101 saukt\u0101s mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformas. K\u0101 zin\u0101ms, 2025.gada 1.janv\u0101r\u012b sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101j\u0101s b\u016btiski groz\u012bjumi CL mantojuma ties\u012bbu da\u013c\u0101.<\/p>\n

Jaunais regul\u0113jums ievie\u0161 virkni jaunin\u0101jumu. Tostarp ar reformu preciz\u0113ts CL\u00a0691.pants<\/a>, kas nosaka, ka gribu pie\u0146emt mantojumu var izsac\u012bt noteikti \u2013 iesniedzot manto\u0161anas iesniegumu not\u0101ram, vai ar\u012b klus\u0113jot \u2013 ar t\u0101du darb\u012bbu, kuru attiec\u012bgajos apst\u0101k\u013cos var iztulkot vien\u012bgi t\u0101, ka zin\u0101ma persona atz\u012bst sevi par mantinieku. Tom\u0113r, saska\u0146\u0101 ar CL 693.pantu, ja mantojuma lieta ir uzs\u0101kta pie not\u0101ra un mantinieki ir uzaicin\u0101ti, ar klus\u0113\u0161anu vairs nepietiek, t.i., ar\u012b mantiniekam, kur\u0161 jau iepriek\u0161 bija pie\u0146\u0113mis mantojumu klus\u0113jot, sava griba termi\u0146\u0101 ir j\u0101pazi\u0146o not\u0101ram. Proti, mantojumu var pie\u0146emt ar\u012b klus\u0113jot (piem\u0113ram, caur faktisko vald\u012bjumu), bet, ja cits mantinieks vai ieinteres\u0113t\u0101 persona, piem\u0113ram, mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja kreditors, p\u0113c tam uzs\u0101k mantojuma lietu, mantiniekiem, kas agr\u0101k pie\u0146\u0113mis mantojumu klus\u0113jot, ir j\u0101p\u0101rtrauc klus\u0113\u0161ana un sludin\u0101jum\u0101 par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos noteiktaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101 j\u0101piesaka savas ties\u012bbas zv\u0113rin\u0101tam not\u0101ram.<\/p>\n

Ar groz\u012bjumiem likum\u0101 noteikti konkr\u0113ti pien\u0101kumi, kas not\u0101ram veicami katr\u0101 mantojuma liet\u0101 neatkar\u012bgi no t\u0101 vai un k\u0101di zin\u0101mie mantinieki nor\u0101d\u012bti manto\u0161anas iesniegum\u0101, ar kuru mantojuma lieta ierosin\u0101ta<\/p>\n

Ar\u012b Notari\u0101ta likums b\u016btiski groz\u012bts, tostarp likuma\u00a0259.1<\/sup>panta<\/a>\u00a02.punkts uzliek not\u0101riem par pien\u0101kumu ieskat\u012bties fizisko personu re\u0123istr\u0101 un noskaidrot miru\u0161\u0101 tuv\u0101kos radiniekus\/mantiniekus l\u012bdz tre\u0161ajai \u0161\u0137irai ieskaitot, k\u0101 ar\u012b p\u0101rdz\u012bvoju\u0161o laul\u0101to. Norma uzliek par pien\u0101kumu not\u0101ram inform\u0113t min\u0113t\u0101s personas par mantojuma izsludin\u0101\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka ar groz\u012bjumiem likum\u0101 noteikti konkr\u0113ti pien\u0101kumi, kas not\u0101ram veicami katr\u0101 mantojuma liet\u0101 neatkar\u012bgi no t\u0101 vai un k\u0101di zin\u0101mie mantinieki nor\u0101d\u012bti manto\u0161anas iesniegum\u0101, ar kuru mantojuma lieta ierosin\u0101ta.<\/p>\n

Vienlaikus, ja sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101 mantinieks nepiesak\u0101s, vi\u0146a mantinieka ties\u012bbas tiek dz\u0113stas. No \u0161\u012b likumdev\u0113js gan ir paredz\u0113jis ar\u012b iz\u0146\u0113mumu, CL 693.panta 2.da\u013c\u0101 nosakot, ka min\u0113tais neattiecas uz mantiniekiem, kas nezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t, ka mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101s ir bijusi izsludin\u0101ta.<\/p>\n

Likumprojekta anot\u0101cij\u0101 paskaidrots, ka ties\u012bbu zaud\u0113\u0161ana neattieksies uz mantiniekiem, kas klus\u0113\u0161anu nav p\u0101rtrauku\u0161i lab\u0101 tic\u012bb\u0101, un ka \u0161\u0101dos gad\u012bjumos vi\u0146i savas ties\u012bbas var\u0113s aizst\u0101v\u0113t ar mantojuma pras\u012bbu. J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka j\u0113dziens \u201cnezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t\u201d apzin\u0101ti norm\u0101 atst\u0101ts k\u0101 \u0123ener\u0101lklauzula, kuru tiesai vai tiesnesim b\u016bs j\u0101piepilda ar konkr\u0113tu saturu katr\u0101 konkr\u0113t\u0101 liet\u0101, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 t\u0101s apst\u0101k\u013cus.<\/p>\n

Publiskaj\u0101 telp\u0101 uzman\u012bba v\u0113rsta uz situ\u0101cij\u0101m, kur\u0101s ir \u0101rvalsts elements, piem\u0113ram, miru\u0161ajam ir vair\u0101ki b\u0113rni, kas dz\u012bvoju\u0161i ar\u012b \u0101rpus Latvijas un par kuriem zi\u0146as Iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju re\u0123istra datos not\u0101ram nav biju\u0161as pieejamas. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, ja mantinieki, kas atrodas Latvij\u0101, ar vi\u0146iem nesazin\u0101s, tad b\u0113rni, kas atrodas \u0101rpus Latvijas par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos var uzzin\u0101t nov\u0113loti. T\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 vi\u0146i var apsv\u0113rt v\u0113r\u0161anos ties\u0101, l\u016bdzot atz\u012bt sevi par mantiniekiem, kaut ar\u012b sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteiktais termi\u0146\u0161 nokav\u0113ts, argument\u0113jot, k\u0101d\u0113\u013c vi\u0146i nezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101s izsludin\u0101\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

Vienlaikus, ja sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101 mantinieks nepiesak\u0101s, vi\u0146a mantinieka ties\u012bbas tiek dz\u0113stas<\/p>\n

L\u012bdz ar to secin\u0101ms \u2013 ja mantojuma liet\u0101s, kas ierosin\u0101tas atbilsto\u0161i iepriek\u0161\u0113jam, l\u012bdz 2024.gada 31.decembrim sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161ajam regul\u0113jumam, zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav pieteicies sludin\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btaj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101, jo not\u0101rs nav izs\u016bt\u012bjis vi\u0146am individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu, sludin\u0101juma termi\u0146\u0161 vi\u0146am nav prekluz\u012bvs. \u0160\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir piem\u0113rojams CL 693.panta 3.da\u013c\u0101 noteiktais gada termi\u0146\u0161 mantojuma pie\u0146em\u0161anai, ko skaita no mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101s br\u012b\u017ea, ja mantojums atrodas vi\u0146a faktisk\u0101 vald\u012bjum\u0101, vai pret\u0113j\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 \u2013 no zi\u0146u sa\u0146em\u0161anas br\u012b\u017ea, ka mantojums atkl\u0101jies. No 2025.gada 1.janv\u0101ra sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161aj\u0101 regul\u0113jum\u0101 CL 693.panta 2.da\u013ca paredz, ka ties\u012bbu dz\u0113\u0161ana neattiecas uz mantiniekiem, kas\u00a0nezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t, ka mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161an\u0101s ir bijusi izsludin\u0101ta<\/em>. Abos gad\u012bjumos mantiniekam j\u0101v\u0113r\u0161as ties\u0101 ar mantojuma pras\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

Mantinieka ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bba<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sen\u0101ta spriedums liet\u0101 SKC-101\/2026 atg\u0101dina \u0161\u0137ietami pa\u0161saprotamu, bet praks\u0113 \u012bpa\u0161i noz\u012bm\u012bgu principu: mantinieka ties\u012bbu zaud\u0113jumu nevar balst\u012bt vien\u012bgi uz form\u0101lu sludin\u0101juma public\u0113\u0161anu \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d, ja zin\u0101majam mantiniekam nav nodro\u0161in\u0101ta re\u0101la iesp\u0113ja uzzin\u0101t par mantojuma atkl\u0101\u0161anos un noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 izteikt gribu mantojumu pie\u0146emt.<\/p>\n

CL 693.panta 2.da\u013c\u0101 ietvert\u0101 \u0123ener\u0101lklauzula \u201cnezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t\u201d nodro\u0161ina mantiniekiem juridisku meh\u0101nismu k\u0101 aizsarg\u0101t savas ties\u012bbas ar\u012b p\u0113c sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteikt\u0101 termi\u0146a notec\u0113\u0161anas<\/p>\n

Tie\u0161i t\u0101d\u0113\u013c ar\u012b p\u0113c 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161\u0101s mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformas Sen\u0101ta paust\u0101s atzi\u0146as nezaud\u0113 aktualit\u0101ti. Jaunais regul\u0113jums ir padar\u012bjis not\u0101ra pien\u0101kumus skaidr\u0101kus un pla\u0161\u0101kus, tom\u0113r tas nav atc\u0113lis pamatjaut\u0101jumu par pien\u0101c\u012bgu mantinieku inform\u0113\u0161anu. Glu\u017ei pret\u0113ji \u2013 jaunaj\u0101 regul\u0113jum\u0101 ietverts ne tikai not\u0101ra pien\u0101kums noskaidrot un inform\u0113t mantiniekus l\u012bdz tre\u0161ajai \u0161\u0137irai, bet ar\u012b CL 693.panta 2.da\u013c\u0101 ietvert\u0101 \u0123ener\u0101lklauzula \u201cnezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t\u201d nodro\u0161ina mantiniekiem juridisku meh\u0101nismu k\u0101 aizsarg\u0101t savas ties\u012bbas ar\u012b p\u0113c sludin\u0101jum\u0101 noteikt\u0101 termi\u0146a notec\u0113\u0161anas.<\/p>\n

Savuk\u0101rt tiesu uzdevums, piepildot j\u0113dziena \u201cnezin\u0101ja vai nevar\u0113ja zin\u0101t\u201d saturu, katr\u0101 konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 b\u016bs v\u0113rt\u0113t lietas apst\u0101k\u013cus un mekl\u0113t l\u012bdzsvaru starp mantojuma lietas \u0101tru noregul\u0113jumu un mantinieku ties\u012bbu efekt\u012bvu aizsardz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

Publik\u0101cija: itiesibas.lv<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":54842,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"country":[96],"class_list":["post-54840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized-lv","country-latvia-lv"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nVai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"lv_LV\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"COBALT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1778\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"L\u012bva Dumpe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"L\u012bva Dumpe\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"L\u012bva Dumpe\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3\"},\"headline\":\"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1878,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Uncategorized @lv\"],\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00\",\"description\":\"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1778},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/news-cases\\\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\",\"name\":\"COBALT\",\"description\":\"Top-tier law services in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"COBALT\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"lv-LV\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cobalt-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cobalt-logo.png\",\"width\":400,\"height\":116,\"caption\":\"COBALT\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CobaltLegal\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3\",\"name\":\"L\u012bva Dumpe\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cobalt.legal\\\/lv\\\/author\\\/liva\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT","description":"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/","og_locale":"lv_LV","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT","og_description":"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/","og_site_name":"COBALT","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1778,"url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"L\u012bva Dumpe","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"L\u012bva Dumpe","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/"},"author":{"name":"L\u012bva Dumpe","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/person\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3"},"headline":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam?","datePublished":"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/"},"wordCount":1878,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg","articleSection":["Uncategorized @lv"],"inLanguage":"lv-LV"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/","name":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam? | COBALT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-24T06:34:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-24T06:35:03+00:00","description":"Sen\u0101ts nesen\u0101 spriedum\u0101 sniedzis atbildi uz b\u016btisku mantojuma ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumu: vai sludin\u0101jums \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d aizst\u0101j individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu zin\u0101mam mantiniekam? Atbilde ir noliedzo\u0161a. Rakst\u0101 analiz\u0113jam sprieduma atzi\u0146as, to saist\u012bbu ar 2025.gad\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os mantojuma ties\u012bbu reformu un praktisk\u0101s sekas \u2013 k\u0101 pieteikties mantojumam un ko dar\u012bt, ja termi\u0146\u0161 ir nokav\u0113ts.Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba un Sen\u0101ta spriedumsK\u0101zuss. T\u0113vs nomirst. D\u0113ls par to neuzzina. Mantojuma lieta pie not\u0101ra tiek pabeigta, un visu mantojumu ieg\u016bst p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101. Tikai p\u0113c vair\u0101kiem gadiem d\u0113ls uzzina ne vien par t\u0113va n\u0101vi, bet ar\u012b par to, ka termi\u0146\u0161 pieteikties mantojumam jau sen beidzies. Vai ar to pietiek, lai uzskat\u012btu, ka vi\u0146\u0161 savas ties\u012bbas ir zaud\u0113jis?Tie\u0161i \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101zuss non\u0101ca l\u012bdz Sen\u0101tam \u2013 turkl\u0101t divas reizes, katrreiz Sen\u0101tam atce\u013cot zem\u0101kas instances tiesas spriedumu. Mantojuma atst\u0101j\u0113ja d\u0113ls (pirm\u0101s \u0161\u0137iras mantinieks) par t\u0113va n\u0101vi uzzin\u0101ja vair\u0101k nek\u0101 divus gadus par v\u0113lu, kad mantojuma lieta jau bija pabeigta un p\u0101rdz\u012bvojus\u012b laul\u0101t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ta k\u0101 vien\u012bg\u0101 mantiniece. Individu\u0101lu pazi\u0146ojumu par mantojuma lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anu d\u0113lam zv\u0113rin\u0101ts not\u0101rs nebija s\u016bt\u012bjis. Vien\u012bgais \u201cuzaicin\u0101jums\u201d jeb inform\u0101cija par ierosin\u0101to lietu bija publik\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas V\u0113stnes\u012b\u201d. D\u0113ls c\u0113la pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret p\u0101rdz\u012bvojo\u0161u laul\u0101to, argument\u0113jot, ka d\u0113ls k\u0101 zin\u0101mais mantinieks nav ticis aicin\u0101ts izteikt gribu pie\u0146emt t\u0113va mantojumu.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"lv-LV","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"lv-LV","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam.jpg","width":2560,"height":1778},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/news-cases\/vai-sludinajums-aizstaj-pazinojumu-mantiniekam\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vai sludin\u0101jums aizst\u0101j pazi\u0146ojumu mantiniekam?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/","name":"COBALT","description":"Top-tier law services in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"lv-LV"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#organization","name":"COBALT","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"lv-LV","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cobalt-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cobalt-logo.png","width":400,"height":116,"caption":"COBALT"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CobaltLegal\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/#\/schema\/person\/6bbab99ed584e23881516eaa77c49aa3","name":"L\u012bva Dumpe","url":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/author\/liva\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54840"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54846,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54840\/revisions\/54846"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54842"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54840"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cobalt.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=54840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}